GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

From:
Subject: Re: FW: [DNA] Probabilities of 37 markers up to 174 markers
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 17:27:03 -0500 (EST)
References: <002001c3be7c$89a15660$8a0aa8c0@William><002001c3be7c$89a15660$8a0aa8c0@William><3.0.6.32.20031209165415.007e6940@mail.sjfn.nb.ca><6.0.0.22.0.20031209200345.104ebe38@wells.org><REME20031210001332@alum.mit.edu> <6.0.0.22.0.20031209230853.056ca060@wells.org>
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20031209230853.056ca060@wells.org> (message fromOrinWells on Tue, 09 Dec 2003 23:11:47 -0800)

Orin wrote:
>Which marker was that?

It runs in my mind that it was "E5" in their private labeling system,
which corresponds to DYS310, according to Diahan Southard.

I'll have to dig out the original report to make sure.

John Chandler

This thread:

• FW: [DNA] Probabilities of 37 markers up to 174 markers by "Lowe DNA" <>
  • Re: FW: [DNA] Probabilities of 37 markers up to 174 markers by OrinWells <>
  • Re: FW: [DNA] Probabilities of 37 markers up to 174 markers by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
    • Re: FW: [DNA] Mutation rates and "faster" moving markers by Charles <>
    • Re: FW: [DNA] Mutation rates and "faster" moving markers by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
      • Re: FW: [DNA] Mutation rates and "faster" moving markers by Charles <>
      • Re: FW: [DNA] Mutation rates and "faster" moving markers by Charles <>
      • Re: FW: [DNA] Mutation rates and "faster" moving markers by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
        • Re: FW: [DNA] Mutation rates and "faster" moving markers by Charles <>
    • Re: FW: [DNA] Probabilities of 37 markers up to 174 markers by OrinWells <>
      • Re: FW: [DNA] Probabilities of 37 markers up to 174 markers by
        • Re: FW: [DNA] Probabilities of 37 markers up to 174 markers by OrinWells <>

          • Re: FW: [DNA] Probabilities of 37 markers up to 174 markers by

  • Re: FW: [DNA] Probabilities of 37 markers up to 174 markers by Bruce Walsh <>
    • Re: FW: [DNA] Probabilities of 37 markers up to 174 markers by David Faux <>
  • Re: FW: [DNA] Probabilities of 37 markers up to 174 markers by
    • Re: FW: [DNA] Probabilities of 37 markers up to 174 markers by OrinWells <>
      • Re: FW: [DNA] Probabilities of 37 markers up to 174 markers by
        • [DNA] Probabilities and markers by "J. M. Freed" <>
          • Re: [DNA] Probabilities and markers by
            • Re: [DNA] Probabilities and markers by OrinWells <>
              • Re: [DNA] Probabilities and markers by
          • Re: [DNA] Probabilities and markers by
        • Re: FW: [DNA] Probabilities of 37 markers up to 174 markers by David Faux <>
          • Re: FW: [DNA] Probabilities of 37 markers up to 174 markers by
    • Re: FW: [DNA] Probabilities of 37 markers up to 174 markers by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
  • [DNA] Probabilities of 37 markers up to 174 markers by "Malcolm Dodd" <>
    • [DNA] Carter Surname Test Results by "Vickie Tallent" <>