GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2003-12 > 1071286670


From: "Louis" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] When Scotland was Jewish (and Muslim)
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 19:37:58 -0800
References: <66.3a53e4a9.2d0bde18@aol.com>


This argument should be simple to prove. Simply compare Sephardic Jewish
DNA with Scottish DNA. What does this seem to show? Of course, it
could have only been a subset of Sephardic Jews headed over to Scotland or
vise-versa. So what percentage of these two groups have genetic overlap?

At least, this is my logic.

Louis



----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2003 7:14 PM
Subject: Re: [DNA] When Scotland was Jewish (and Muslim)


> In a message dated 12/12/2003 9:26:59 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> writes:
>
> > If you will take a look at the Burgess, Apprentice, Census and Cemetery
> > records for Scotland, especially Glasgow, Aberdeen and Perthshire, as
well
> > as
> > St Andrews, I believe you will find many surnames that 'shouldn't' be
there.
> >
> > Try taking a look also at the genealogies for the Bruce, Alexander,
Stewart,
> >
> > Fraser/Frisell and other French originating clan families.
> >
>
> I think you had better show me a lot more proof than the conjecture I've
been
> reading so far. Part of my family is from Scotland, descendants of the
Bruce
> clan. If you think that name "shouldn't be there," I suggest you re-read
your
> Scots history, going back to King Robert the Bruce, etc. You are off base.
>
> Tia
>
>
> ==============================
> To join Ancestry.com and access our 1.2 billion online genealogy records,
go to:
> http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=571&sourceid=1237
>


This thread: