GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2004-01 > 1073127861


From: "Philippe NITHART" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] RELATED OR NOT? WORTH FURTHER TESTING?
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2004 12:04:30 +0100
References: <20040103074747.61776.qmail@web20809.mail.yahoo.com>


You seem much more experienced that I am.... Where can I find this type of
information (% of population within each marker)? I have printed quite a bit
of documentation, but I missed that one!
Cheers
Philippe

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Chamblin" <>
To: <>
Sent: Saturday, January 03, 2004 8:47 AM
Subject: Re: [DNA] RELATED OR NOT? WORTH FURTHER TESTING?


> Philippe,
> What is even more suprising is marker 391, where only 2.4 % of the people
have this number, plus the 11/12 match. Wow, what are the odds of that?
> TomC
>
> Philippe NITHART <> wrote:
> Hi Tom!
> Yes, surprising indeed!
> What does this means? that testing with 12 markers is too vague and covers
a
> broad range of people related or not related? , simply that statistically
we
> are bond to find similar or about similar results without any connection?
or
> that there may be way back in pre-historic times a possible common
ancestor?
> I really don't know what to conclude!
> I am waiting for my results at dna heritage based on their 21 markers. I
> will post them as well or send them to you directly so that you can see if
> there is also a match on the additional markers.
> Cheers
> Philippe
> Philippe NITHART - F-06400 Cannes
> E-mail: (enlever xy: anti spam)
> Site: http://www.nithart.com
> Site Angl/allem: http://www.wwgenealogy.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tom Chamblin"
> To:
> Sent: Friday, January 02, 2004 7:37 PM
> Subject: Re: [DNA] RELATED OR NOT? WORTH FURTHER TESTING?
>
>
> > Philippe, I match you individual 11/12. The only difference is in 389i.
I
> match your value
> > at that marker. As far as I know I have no one in my tree names NITHART.
> Interesting!
> > TomC
> > David Faux wrote:
> > Hello Phillipe:
> >
> > I had the same situation with a Faux relative whose common ancestor with
> me was 350 years ago. He upgraded to 25 markers and the next set of 13
> matched perfectly. My recommendation, both of you upgrade to a higher
> resolution level - it is the only to clarify the meaning of your present
> results.
> >
> > David F.
> >
> > Philippe NITHART
> > wrote:
> > Hello!
> > I just received results for me and another person with same family name
> > (same spelling 5/600 years ago):
> > 393: 12 - 13
> > 390: 24 - 24
> > 19: 14 - 14
> > 391: 11 - 12
> > 385a: 11 - 11
> > 385b: 14 - 13
> > 426: 12 - 12
> > 388: 12 - 12
> > 439: 13 - 11
> > 389.1: 12 - 13
> > 393: 13 - 13
> > 389.2: 28 - 29
> > Both are supposed to be R1b.
> >
> > Since there are only 7 similar markers out of twelve , is the conclusion
> > that there are definitely no match or is it more subtle than that?
> >
> > Is it worth further investigation in spite of the current discussion on
> > MRCA?
> >
> > Sorry to bother the group with such basic questions, but, in spite of
> > reading all messages on this group and printing material, I feel ill at
> ease
> > with this very first handling! I guess that I will be Ok for the others,
> > after receiving your concrete help in layman's words if possible for
this
> > initial one...
> > Just for information, my classic family tree goes back on paper to the
> > middle age in South Alsace, while the other name variants (or same
> > spellings) are located in nearby Switzerland & Germany and also Austria.
> > A very happy new year to all.
> > Philippe
> > Philippe NITHART - F-06400 Cannes
> > E-mail: (enlever xy: anti spam)
> > Site: http://www.nithart.com
> > Site Angl/allem: http://www.wwgenealogy.com
> >
> >
> >
> > ==============================
> > Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration
> > Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more.
> > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237
> >
> >
> > Dr. David K. Faux, P.O. Box 192, Seal Beach, CA, 90740, USA
> >
> >
> >
> > www.davidkfaux.org
> >
> >
> >
> > ==============================
> > Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration
> > Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more.
> > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
> >
> >
> > ==============================
> > Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration
> > Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more.
> > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ==============================
> Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration
> Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more.
> http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Find out what made the Top Yahoo! Searches of 2003
>
>
> ==============================
> Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration
> Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more.
> http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237
>
>


This thread: