GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2004-02 > 1077517095


From: "Mary AsaWoman" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] genotypes/print test results
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 22:18:15 -0800
References: <20040223023426.41676.qmail@web41505.mail.yahoo.com> <021c01c3f9c0$6fe4ab80$913c1cce@computer>


This is my guess as to what happened:

The difference between 2.0 and 2.5 is that 2.0 did not record and, or show
the Sub-Saharan African, but instead, melded it into the Indo-European with
a little taken off of the East Asian and Native American. This is a bit
strange, I think, and should be explained in such a way that us dummies can
understand it.

Mary with the cats

----- Original Message -----
From: "Penny Ferguson" <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, February 22, 2004 19:52 PM
Subject: [DNA] genotypes/print test results


> Crystal said:
> "How were they different? (just curious how it's turning out retaking
it)..
> but what we've been told (well as I understand it)... is that they have
> increased the no. of markers .. mostly european markers. "
>
>
> Here is one:
>
> The 2. test showed
> 2 % East Asian, 3 % NA, and 95% EU.
>
> The 2.5 showed
> 83 % EU, 12 % Sub-Saharan African, 4 % NA, 1 % East Asian
>
> Penny
>
>
>
>
> ==============================
> Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration
> Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more.
> http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237
>

This thread: