GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2004-02 > 1077895359


From: Charles <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] DNA testing turn around time
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:22:39 -0500
References: <p05100309bc6417ee117f@[192.168.2.30]> <6.0.0.22.0.20040226212851.0371a048@wells.org>
In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.0.20040226212851.0371a048@wells.org>


Orin,

You mention the UK and it reminded me that the other lab located in the
UK, DNAHeritage.com, has stopped taking orders per a notice in their
website order page.

Charles

OrinWells wrote:
> At 01:59 PM 2/26/2004, Pat Oliver wrote:
>
>> For anyone wondering if it now takes longer to get results back from
>> FTDNA than earlier, here is my (very limited) experience.
>
>
> Sounds like we chose the right lab if time to receive results are an
> indication. It sure helps those who are impatient. The latest results
> from Relative Genetics were reported 8 days after being notified of
> receipt of the sample at the lab. Sample received at lab 2/17 - results
> reported 2/25.
>
> I have seen nothing under two weeks for the past several months. They
> really have their lab humming.
>
> This sample is a 24 out of 26 match to a UK sample we picked up last
> Spring. So we now know that his was not a non-paternal event and these
> two have a common ancestor somewhere up their trees giving us yet
> another Wells baseline family. The earliest ancestor for the UK sample
> was 1709 Kent. The US was Cir 1800 South Carolina. This is getting
> more interesting as time goes on and more samples are tested.
>
> I have also found a Wells family who are descended from a German
> origin. First I have come across. Should be interesting to see their DNA.
>
> Orin R. Wells
> Wells Family Research Association
> P. O. Box 5427
> Kent, Washington 98064-5427
> <>
> http://www.wells.org
> Subscribe to the "Wells-L" list on RootsWeb


This thread: