GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2004-06 > 1086117974
Subject: Re: [DNA] Interpreting -- getting results for all markers ordered
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 15:26:14 EDT
In a message dated 6/1/2004 1:57:52 PM Central Standard Time,
> I am a big fan of FTDNA, and freely admit it.
There seems to be more to it than that. You know or should know by now that
your previous post was based on Charles' incorrect interpretation of Diane's
results. Yet, you have not posted a retraction.
This is on top of your reference to DNAHeritage's "checkered history," even
though they had the same problem as FTDNA. Both used university labs that could
not keep up with the order flow. "Checkered" carries the implication of
crooked dealings. Yet Alastair was so honest he gave per-diem rebates for late
results, even though most people had paid only $80 for a 20-marker test.
|Re: [DNA] Interpreting -- getting results for all markers ordered by|