Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2004-06 > 1088457094

From: "Shankland\(Train\)" <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] Shankland/lin mystery deepens! Part 2
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:11:34 -0400
In-Reply-To: <002f01c45c8b$a3074a30$6401a8c0@Home2>


Thanks for the responses.

While talking to Bennett about something else he pointed out that our
markers 13-15 458 459 a and b were "very very unusual" 17,7,10.

This further supports the relationship argument as many here already
pointed out.

In further clarification he stated that 17 out 10009 men had this

I wonder if anyone could tell me what the signifagence, if any, of this
grouping might be?

Are any of the other 15 men with these values on this board?


John Shankland

This thread: