GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2004-06 > 1088457094
From: "Shankland\(Train\)" <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] Shankland/lin mystery deepens! Part 2
Date: Mon, 28 Jun 2004 17:11:34 -0400
Thanks for the responses.
While talking to Bennett about something else he pointed out that our
markers 13-15 458 459 a and b were "very very unusual" 17,7,10.
This further supports the relationship argument as many here already
In further clarification he stated that 17 out 10009 men had this
I wonder if anyone could tell me what the signifagence, if any, of this
grouping might be?
Are any of the other 15 men with these values on this board?
|RE: [DNA] Shankland/lin mystery deepens! Part 2 by "Shankland\(Train\)" <>|