GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2004-08 > 1092847251


From: "Parcfada" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Another unidentified result
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 17:40:51 +0100
References: <8c.125a8d12.2e52c1b9@aol.com> <00b901c48498$0ddd0320$4c8ecbc1@f2i6i5> <000f01c484a0$593efaf0$aae289d1@Ken1>


Many thanks to Ken, Mike and others for solving this problem for me.
Peter.

----- Original Message -----
From: Ken Nordtvedt
To:
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Another unidentified result


I1c


----- Original Message -----
>From: "Parcfada" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 2:06 PM
Subject: [DNA] Another unidentified result


> With the fantastic response Grant got from his query, may I pick
everybody's brains regarding the possible haplogroup for one of the Langleys
which I have been unable to pin down.
> It is:
>
> 14 24 16 10 15 15 11 13 11 13 12 29
>
> Cheers
> Peter.
>
>
> ==============================
> Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration
> Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more.
> http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237
>
>



==============================
Gain access to over two billion names including the new Immigration
Collection with an Ancestry.com free trial. Click to learn more.
http://www.ancestry.com/rd/redir.asp?targetid=4930&sourceid=1237



This thread: