GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-01 > 1106757542
From: Whitney Keen <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Suggestion
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 11:39:02 -0500
Good idea, if I can remember how to spell it.
Mike Harper wrote:
> Has anyone tried spelling it out as deoxyribonucleic acid?
> Michael Harper
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Terry Barton [mailto:]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 8:49 PM
> Subject: RE: [DNA] Suggestion
> John, I appreciate and support your proposed approach, and recommend it
> general. But, I don't believe it addresses the real issue we face. Our
> problem is the continued removal of postings about an important aspect
> modern genealogy. The removals have no consistent pattern or basis,
> than the use of the word "DNA" and many are not being done by the Board
> List managers. There is no set of rules that you can follow, if you
> to use the phrase "DNA" and still hope to avoid removal over time.
> problems are not being suffered only by those who have simply shown up
> of nowhere" one day, posting about a DNA Project. And, the removals are
> only on those postings which have some "commercial" slant. I had one
> posting removed which simply announced that we had new results and
> information, which could be read at the website.
> Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the
> areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months.
> Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx
|Re: [DNA] Suggestion by Whitney Keen <>|