GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-01 > 1107043011


From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Re: Eu19, HG3 or R1a
Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2005 16:56:53 -0700
References: <20050129235012.38792.qmail@web52506.mail.yahoo.com>


That's reasonable for age of entry into Indian sub-continent, but one
reading of David's post was that that was suggested age of R1a's founding
which seems much too young.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dienekes Pontikos" <>
To: <>
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 4:50 PM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Re: Eu19, HG3 or R1a


--- Ken Nordtvedt <> wrote:

> Are you claiming anyone seriously estimates R1a as
> young as 3500 years ago?

3500 years refers to the time that R1a chromosomes
entered specifically into India, and not to the age of
the common ancestor of all R1a chromosomes of the world.

=====
Dienekes' Anthropology Blog: http://dienekes.blogspot.com/



__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
All your favorites on one personal page - Try My Yahoo!
http://my.yahoo.com


==============================
Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the
areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months.
Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx




This thread: