GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-03 > 1109734693


From: "Michael Crocker" <>
Subject: 385i, 385ii ?
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 22:38:13 -0500


>have capability of acquiring NEW knowledge --- the actual order in the
>chromosome of the two numbers at DYS 385a,b (and in principle YCAIIa,b,
>459a,b, .... I presume).

Since the new test makes them distinguishable, would that not make it more appropriate to refer to them as 385i and 385ii? (but still use a,b without directional test)

Is this likely to be of any use for R1b 11,14 AMH types?


This thread: