GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-03 > 1110067795
From: Carol Botteron <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] Open and Closed Genealogy and DNA population LIMITATIONS
Date: Sat, 5 Mar 2005 19:09:55 -0500
Jim, this is a file that would have to be downloaded, taking 29 minutes.
Can someone please just tell us what this is about?
At 4:29 PM -0500 2005-03-05, Jim Lawson wrote:
>David, since you found the lead in Malcolm's post, I will only add this link
>that is on that same post from Malcolm.
>Bet you all are not aware of your fetish.
>I believe that the subject conference is to be held next week in case
>someone wants to attend. :)
>Sent: Saturday, March 05, 2005 4:03 PM
>Subject: RE: [DNA] Open and Closed Genealogy and DNA population LIMITATIONS
>Sorry, it should have been obvious, the content of Ms. Tallbear's
>presentation at the AAA Conference in 2003 can be found by clicking on the
>link provided by Malcolm.
>-------------- Original message --------------
>> Thanks for this "heads up". I too have agreed to be interviewed by KT. If
>> there is anything that smacks of a political agenda then I need to know
>> I will have absolutely nothing whatsoever to say as it will probably only
>> can of worms.
>> Would you please be so kind as to offer us some specifics. On List would
>> fair game if the information is in the public domain. I expect that I am
>> the only one to agree to further contacts here and I am very upset now
>> provided links to the DNA work I have done in relation to my First Nations
>> heritage. I fear that my gesture to assist a fellow researcher may have
>> potential to backfire on me badly.
>> David F.
>> -------------- Original message --------------
>> > Ken, Malcolm, Ann and the list, such is serendipity. Ann recently posted
>> > notice of Kimberly TallBear regarding her quest to interview people who
>> > DNA to ascertain Native American heritage, Malcolm posted to the thread
>> > people having different agendas and Ken responded to Malcolm. While
>> > drawn in over my head about STD researchers, I did notice that, in
>> > conjunction, to the reference to Bolnick by Malcolm, there is also a
>> > connection to Kimberly TallBear. It seems that Ms TallBear has an agenda
>> > too. She presented papers at the same conference that Malcolm
>> > I had just made an appointment for an interview with Ms TallBear before
>> > connecting all the dots. Suffice it to say, I won't be stepping in to a
>> > "Beartrap".
>> > One more comment; just as a casual observer, I have become aware that
>> > magic word "diversity" will ultimately suck us all into its maw and the
>> > implications of how one defines free speech is not lost on me.
>> > Regards, Jim
>> Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the
>> areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months.
>> Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx
>Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more.
>Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more:
>New! Family Tree Maker 2005. Build your tree and search for your ancestors at the same time. Share your tree with family and friends. Learn more: http://landing.ancestry.com/familytreemaker/2005/tour.aspx?sourceid=14599&targetid=5429
|RE: [DNA] Open and Closed Genealogy and DNA population LIMITATIONS by Carol Botteron <>|