Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-03 > 1110389644

From: "ernest hurst" <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] Re: my genes showed 4% Native American which seems a bit odd
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2005 12:34:04 -0500


I'm just going by what I've seen before, on this list & others. The only
way they go away, is if nobody responds, or if they're kicked off the list.
I guess if they consider either of those to be "assent", thats OK with me.

Ernie Hurst

> [Original Message]
> From: < (Raymond Whritenour)>
> To: <>
> Date: 3/9/2005 12:15:38 PM
> Subject: [DNA] Re: my genes showed 4% Native American which seems a bit
> Ernie wrote:
> "I do believe, that the best way to deal with this nonsensical claim (as
> well as another recently posted) is to ignore it. If you question them,
> they will just go on, and on, and on. It's really amazing to me that
> anyone with such beliefs would be subscribed to a mostly scientific
> list. Whatever floats your boat, I guess."
> Ernie:
> I would agree with this, wholeheartedly, but for those words of Thomas
> More, which I've always kept in mind, to the effect that "under the law,
> silence signifies assent."
> Ray Whritenour
> ==============================
> Jumpstart your genealogy with OneWorldTree. Search not only for
> ancestors, but entire generations. Learn more:

This thread: