GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-03 > 1110403625
From: Doug McDonald <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Re ; DNA Print test
Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2005 15:27:05 -0600
References: <firstname.lastname@example.org> <REME20050309161353@alum.mit.edu>
John Chandler wrote:
> Ellen wrote:
>>We know little, if anything, about DNAprints autosomal
>>tests. They are even more mysterious than FTDNA's DNA
>>database - I didn't think I would find a greater
>>mystery than that. What autosomal markers do they
> Ann was able to identify ten of the 72 markers used in the 2.0
> version of the test. See the list archives for that discussion.
> Based on the inferred allele frequencies in the reference
> populations, I have some other guesses as well, but these are
> only guesses.
Has anybody compared to that actual published paper (recent)
with lots of autosomal markers and the frequency in
Europeans, Asians, and Africans (but not Americans)?
As you might remember, I found a goodly number of markers there
that could be used to make a "biogeographical" test.