Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-03 > 1111442714

From: "Paul Drake" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Drake Project
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 16:05:14 -0600
References: <> <000d01c52e2d$5056d0c0$78e91e3e@ilbg18230> <0bbd01c52e2d$c6c173a0$6400a8c0@oemcomputer> <07f401c52e60$65c47880$0200a8c0@c452380a>

Thanks, Earl. Yep, have been a participant in that effort since almost the outset. If you are familiar with those results, I am #4113. I thought perhaps someone on the DNA site might also be on the Drake site, since I do not know what or where my results fit in all the discussions on the DNA site.

Who was your wife's gmother?
----- Original Message -----
From: Earl Beaty
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 3:53 PM
Subject: [DNA] Drake Project


I presume you are aware of the rather large Drake Y project at FTDNA. Your
subject line indicates an interest in MtDNA. Whether Y or Mt I don't see how
you could limit the scope to before 1800.

My wife had a grandmother who was a Drake, but it has been a few years since
I was active in Drake research. I have had the general thought that DNA
testing would be a valuable tool in sorting out the Drakes.

--Earl Beaty

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Drake" <>
To: <>
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Question MtDNA haplogroup

> Is anyone on this list doing any Drakes before 1800, please ????

Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more.'s United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more:

This thread: