GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-03 > 1112038028
Subject: Re: [DNA] SMGF Upgrade and DYS463 Nomenclature in Ysearch
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:27:08 EST
Thanks, Max ...
My Sorenson 463 is 21, translating to a 19 in FTNDA's jargon, correct? So,
the question David & I had was: "should we enter the "Sorenson value -2" into
Ysearch? I have assumed the answer is yes.
In a message dated 3/28/2005 7:34:59 AM Pacific Standard Time,
Dr. Alan Redd, a member of Family Tree DNA Advisory Board, is the
discoverer of this marker. He shows that 24 is modal for that marker in
most populations, with a range of 18-25, but with 24 enjoying about 60% of
the results...therefore if your results are with R1b you probably have a 24
versus anything else for that marker.
E-mail me any time!
Vice-President, Operations and Marketing
"History Unearthed Daily"
At 04:59 PM 3/27/2005, you wrote:
>I'm upgrading my Ysearch data with Sorenson results & I assumed that
>expects the FTDNA variety of DYS463, but I'm not certain.
>I expect Max or Bennett to chime in ...
>In a message dated 3/27/2005 12:07:22 PM Pacific Standard Time,
>I added this marker's larger NIST-compliant value to my Ysearch record
>than the lower-by-two value that is used by DNA Heritage and Ybase. (That
>is, I posted the value 24 for DYS463 rather than 22.) Is this consistent
>with what others on this list have done when they posted extra markers to
>Would Max or Bennett care to make a comment about FTDNA's position on
>DYS463? Their firm does not test for it, but they include it in Ysearch and
>may have an idea about how it should be handled. Some of the posted values
>in Ysearch for this marker probably originated from DNA Heritage, and some
>probably originated from Sorenson. I suspect there is an inconsistent mix
>values for this marker in Ysearch.
Admin: FTDNA Humphrey project
Co-Admin: FTDNA Liles project
multi-family project:Humphrey, Liles, Morton
|Re: [DNA] SMGF Upgrade and DYS463 Nomenclature in Ysearch by|