GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-03 > 1112039804
From:
Subject: Re: [DNA] R1a1 - Dating of M17
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2005 14:56:44 EST
True. And also true is that the inital goal of Ken, John's & my recent
simulation efforts was to do "virtual experiments" to gather data, specifically to
analyze the difference between our observed f/s rates & the popular (1/3rd)
published population rates.
ASD was intended to give ratio of time of a subpopulation with a parent
population, not absolute rates, or TMRCA.
Yes, we can incorporate allele length tendencies to mutate up/down, more
markers & their individual rates, and even, *intentional rare events*,
real-world input. :-)
Mike ...
=================================================
In a message dated 3/28/2005 6:39:59 AM Pacific Standard Time,
writes:
Simulations, unless done intentionally, don't simulate rare
events, such as are known to have happened in history.
Doug McDonald
=======================================================
Admin: FTDNA Humphrey project
Co-Admin: FTDNA Liles project
http://humphreygenealogy.com
multi-family project:Humphrey, Liles, Morton
This thread:
| Re: [DNA] R1a1 - Dating of M17 by |