GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-05 > 1115132422
From: Robert Stafford <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Newbie: National Geographic, Relative Genetics, DNA Heritage,Family Tree DNA etc
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 08:00:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: 6667
Actually, there is no tradeoff between speed and cost. RG and DNAHeritage are both faster and cheaper than FTDNA. Some may be willing to pay more at FTDNA because of their emphasis on ancient ancestry. RG is much stronger in genealogical applications.
Bob Stafford
Phil Goff <> wrote:
Bill, Ken:
Many participants are sensitive to cost while others,
like a benefactor who has financed six tests out of his own pocket, are more
interested in speed of reporting. In other words, everyone's needs are
different.
This thread:
| Re: [DNA] Newbie: National Geographic, Relative Genetics, DNA Heritage,Family Tree DNA etc by Robert Stafford <> |