GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

From: Doug McDonald <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Non-paternity
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 12:13:35 -0500
References: <20050519170638.25814.qmail@web81803.mail.mud.yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050519170638.25814.qmail@web81803.mail.mud.yahoo.com>

The real phrase that correctly describes "non-paternity event"
for our DNA-genealogy purposes is "bad documentation". It doesn't
matter whether somebody is adopted, or a bastard, if it is correctly
documented. One of he most famous of my ancestors was a bastard, but
we all know who the parents were.

Doug McDonald

This thread:

• Non-paternity by "Earl Beaty" <>
  • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by "Phil Goff" <>
    • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by "Earl Beaty" <>
  • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by (John Chandler)
    • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by "Earl Beaty" <>
      • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by (John Chandler)
      • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by John Carr <>
        • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by "Earl Beaty" <>
          • RE: [DNA] Non-paternity - posting at Y-search and Y-base by <>
            • Posting at Y-search and Y-base by "Earl Beaty" <>
              • RE: [DNA] Posting at Y-search and Y-base by "Lowe DNA" <>
              • Re: Posting at Y-search and Y-base by "Joe Fox" <>
            • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by Robert Stafford <>
              • RE: [DNA] Non-paternity by "Jim Bullock" <>
                • RE: [DNA] Non-paternity - posting Lineages instead of individuals by <>
                  • RE: [DNA] Non-paternity - posting Lineages instead of individuals by "Jim Bullock" <>
                    • RE: [DNA] Non-paternity - posting Lineages instead of individuals by <>
                      • Barton-Bullock Test Comparisons by "Jim Bullock" <>
                  • RE: [DNA] Non-paternity - posting Lineages instead of individuals by Robert Stafford <>
  • RE: Non-paternity by "Andrew and Inge" <>
    • Re: [DNA] RE: Non-paternity by <>
      • Re: [DNA] RE: Non-paternity by "Eric Olson" <>
    • Re: [DNA] RE: Non-paternity by "Earl Beaty" <>
      • RE: [DNA] RE: Non-paternity by "Andrew and Inge" <>
  • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by
  • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by
  • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by Robert Stafford <>
    • RE: [DNA] Non-paternity by "Glen Todd" <>
  • RE: [DNA] Non-paternity by Robert Stafford <>

    • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by Doug McDonald <>

      • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by "Earl Beaty" <>
        • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by "Phil Goff" <>
  • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by Robert Stafford <>
    • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by Doug McDonald <>
  • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by
  • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by Robert Stafford <>
  • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by
  • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by
  • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by
  • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by "John A. Blair" <>
  • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by Robert Stafford <>
    • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by "Phil Goff" <>
      • Re: [DNA] Ancestral Haplotype by Charles <>
  • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by
    • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by "Phil Goff" <>
    • RE: [DNA] Non-paternity by "Roberta J. Estes" <>
  • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by Robert Stafford <>
  • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by
  • Re: [DNA] Non-paternity by
    • RE: [DNA] Non-paternity by "Glen Todd" <>