GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-06 > 1118250786
Subject: Re: [DNA] DNA Analysis for Conventional Genealogy vs. Deep Ancestry
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 10:13:06 -0700
References: <email@example.com> <005401c56c37$75e88160$6501a8c0@KEN>
AMEN!! Ken Graves has said it correctly. The name of the list is
Genealogy-DNA, not Anthropology-DNA.
I'm not in the least interested in who might have begun my lines thousands
of years ago. I'd be happy if I could find a connection in the more recent
To me, it comes across that several members are more interested in
anthropology, and that is their perogrative.
However, the list also seems to be controlled by a dozen or so and the rest
of us dummies are left in the dust.
|Re: [DNA] DNA Analysis for Conventional Genealogy vs. Deep Ancestry by <>|