GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-06 > 1118287277


From: "Roberta J. Estes" <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] DNA Analysis for Conventional Genealogy vs. Deep Ancestry
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 23:21:17 -0400
In-Reply-To: <42A7828D.3000009@gforcecable.com>


I call those "line markers". If you can find enough people to test, you
can find where they occurred and if they are rare enough, they can be
exceedingly useful.

Roberta Estes

-----Original Message-----
From: Allen Blancett [mailto:]
Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 7:43 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [DNA] DNA Analysis for Conventional Genealogy vs. Deep
Ancestry

Robert Stafford wrote:

>Several of us are looking for branch tags by upgrading as much as
possible. In our project, we found several mutations that define
branches.
>
>
Branch tags--it's probably in the archives, but it's a new term to me.
I like it. That's what I'm trying to find in my subgroup within the
Blanchard project.

Allen B.


==============================
View and search Historical Newspapers. Read about your ancestors, find
marriage announcements and more. Learn more:
http://www.ancestry.com/s13969/rd.ashx




This thread: