GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-06 > 1118399066


From: valery zaporozchenko <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] mtDNA classification and help
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 14:24:26 +0400
References: <000101c56d9b$7a230100$6f7ba8c0@thinkerone>


Neither indels 16183.1C, 16183.2C nor the transition at 16189 are
diagnostic. As for L3b 124-223-278-362 and L3d 124-223(-319), they seem to
be distant from the given sequence even we ignore hvs2: each site taken
separately is not a weighty one but all sites do certainly make sense
together.

Valery

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Tarнn" <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2005 1:04 PM
Subject: RE: [DNA] mtDNA classification and help


> Initially I also saw this as H from looking at Supplementary Data from
> Richards et al. (2000) but when I looked in the mtDNA Concordance I found
an
> HVR1 sequence 16024 (omitted), 16183.1C, 16183.2C, 16189C for Afro-Carib.
> Just now looking at Charles Kerchner's mtDNA Log I see there are listed an
H
> and H5a1 with HVR2 of 263G, 309.1C, 309.2C, 315.1C, 456T. I find it
> interesting that the FBI database has an exact match of African origin.
>
> I guess I am hitting the trees whilst running through the mtDNA woods!
>
> Robert
>


This thread: