GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-06 > 1119037281


From: "Jim Bullock" <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] Wall Street editorial
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2005 13:41:21 -0600
In-Reply-To: <auto-000003393780@mail1.warpdriveonline.com>


Please, let's not get into a discussion on the skills of WSJ reporters or
Oprah's motives for being tested.

Jim

-----Original Message-----
From: Glen Todd [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 1:24 PM
To:
Subject: RE: [DNA] Wall Street editorial


> I read this editorial this morning and was very disappointed
> in it. I usually enjoy reading the Journal, but this editorial
> is an example of ignorance. I noticed no author's name
> attached to the article, and was hoping lots of genealogists
> would write in and complain.

This is probably a bit OT for the list, but I've noticed that the WSJ seems
to have one or two op-ed writers who would probably be more at home working
for the National Enquirer. I would suggest a general letter to the
editor. Personally, I couldn't care less if Oprah was from Venus, and I
would expect that anything that she was involved in would be far more
sensationalism and self-promotion than science.

Glen


==============================
Jumpstart your genealogy with OneWorldTree. Search not only for
ancestors, but entire generations. Learn more:
http://www.ancestry.com/s13972/rd.ashx



This thread: