GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-06 > 1119541877
From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] redundant SNPs?
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:51:17 -0600
OK; thanks for the technical exactitude which most of us are aware of. That
is why I put "redundant" in parenthesis. I should have said "presently
redundant" or "temporarily redundant".
----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Paine" <>
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 9:40 AM
Subject: [DNA] redundant SNPs?
> Ken wrote
> "Does danger lurk when researchers use different ones of the "redundant"
> There are no redundant SNPs.
> Any SNP will be defining if we find surviving haplotypes that branch at
> Robert Paine
> New! Family Tree Maker 2005. Build your tree and search for your ancestors
at the same time. Share your tree with family and friends. Learn more: