GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-06 > 1119541877


From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] redundant SNPs?
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 09:51:17 -0600
References: <001f01c57809$d58b6b90$6401a8c0@DAD>


OK; thanks for the technical exactitude which most of us are aware of. That
is why I put "redundant" in parenthesis. I should have said "presently
redundant" or "temporarily redundant".


----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Paine" <>
To: <>
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 9:40 AM
Subject: [DNA] redundant SNPs?


> Ken wrote
>
> "Does danger lurk when researchers use different ones of the "redundant"
SNPs?"
>
> There are no redundant SNPs.
>
> Any SNP will be defining if we find surviving haplotypes that branch at
that point.
>
> Robert Paine
>
>
> ==============================
> New! Family Tree Maker 2005. Build your tree and search for your ancestors
at the same time. Share your tree with family and friends. Learn more:
http://landing.ancestry.com/familytreemaker/2005/tour.aspx?sourceid=14599&targetid=5429
>
>



This thread: