GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-06 > 1119664058
From: "Peter A. Kincaid" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] "Indigenous, etc."
Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2005 22:47:38 -0300
References: <"Glen Todd" <email@example.com><6894-42BCB525firstname.lastname@example.org>
Funny how when I look up the word aboriginal in
Websters I see 2. native or indigenous. Are the
English majors coming on board now? Call it
what you want but to me indigenous=aboriginal=
At 10:36 PM 24/06/2005, you wrote:
>The only people who are NOT "indigenous" or "native" are those who
>weren't born in the place (however delineated) they inhabit.
>The first people to inhabit a region (however delineated) should be
>designated as "aboriginal" or "primitive."
>Jumpstart your genealogy with OneWorldTree. Search not only for
>ancestors, but entire generations. Learn more:
|Re: [DNA] "Indigenous, etc." by "Peter A. Kincaid" <>|