GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-06 > 1119896198


From: Robert Davenport <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Macro vs. Micro View of Genetic Genealogy
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 11:16:38 -0700
References: <000601c57b27$05aad570$1a466144@valuediebi9vu4>
In-Reply-To: <000601c57b27$05aad570$1a466144@valuediebi9vu4>


It seems to me, you need 3 lists, one for Y DNA 37 marker people, one for
MtDNA, and one for the SNP people and their haplogroups. They definitely
seem to be three different discussions.







At 07:46 AM 6/27/2005, you wrote:
>I don't know about you, but it seems evident to me that this list has been
>completely taken over by those whose focus is entirely upon the very
>broad-brush picture of ancestry provided by MtDNA studies, as opposed to
>the reason most of us got into genetic genealogy in the first place; i.e.,
>to use Y-DNA data in conjunction with our "paper trail" research to find
>specific ancestors with known names. Whatever happened to that?
>
>Endless discussions of the technical details of haplotypes that include
>half the people of Europe and endless speculations over which band of
>nameless, faceless paleolithic ancestors migrated to where from where have
>just left me so numb I don't even bother to read the posts on this list
>anymore. How about getting back to the root purpose of surname studies;
>i.e., breaking down brickwalls in conventional research and finding
>connections to specific, known individuals? After you know you're an R1B
>and your ancestors migrated out of Africa and across the Eurasian
>continent, what else is there to know about them? Will I ever know their
>names? No. Will I ever know anything about how they lived their individual
>lives? Only to the extent that archaeology can provide any evidence of
>specific settlements.
>
>Am I the only one who feels the need for a separate list for those of us
>who run surname studies, or participate in them, and whose focus is upon
>establishing links between ancestors who lived in historical times?
>
>Gary
>
>
>==============================
>Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the
>last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more:
>http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx


This thread: