GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-07 > 1120198201


From: "Lowe DNA" <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] Hammer's SNP Derived States for YCC haplotypes
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2005 01:10:03 -0500
In-Reply-To: <070120050517.25683.42C4D1CF000F3FB2000064532207021573050B989A0E00@comcast.net>


David...

Thanks... It is time all of the coordinator take DNA testing to the next
level with deep SNP testing
to close the gap between recent STRs and ancestral SNPs.

It is my hope that you and Jim are pushing the other academics to sit up and
take
notice of our little bunch of folks (39,000 at FTDNA alone) that are
clamoring
for more detailed DNA testing.

Please, keep us posted.

Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: David Faux [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2005 12:17 AM
To:
Subject: RE: [DNA] Hammer's SNP Derived States for YCC haplotypes


Bill:

We have all the known subclades pinned down (e.g., for Haplogroup J) using
the now unavailable 2005 chart (or perhaps it has just gone into hiding). I
am glad I have my framed copy here to relay information to my colleague who
is constructing the primers. Your wish will come true in about a week.

David F.



-------------- Original message --------------

> David and Ken..
>
> Think some November questions on these two charts are in order...
>
> Perhaps some answers can be found about the new SNP/sub-clades
> in the 2005 chart..
>
> Personally, I have been waiting almost 11 months for the deep level
> SNP tests to begin..
>
> Biill
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Faux [mailto:]
> Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 6:50 PM
> To:
> Subject: Re: [DNA] Hammer's SNP Derived States for YCC haplotypes
>
>
> Ken:
>
> I went to the YCC site (operated by the U of Arizona), knowing that last
> year at the FTDNA (U of Arizona) Conference we were given 2005
Phylogenetic
> Charts. The site has not been revised since 2002 - a lot has happened in
> the last 3 years. I can find no reference to the 2005 version any longer,
> even on the FTDNA website. Fortunately I have my copy framed and we are
> using it as a guide to the various subclades as they are now understood -
> but that lack of availablity of information puzzles me. It is diffiucult
to
> discuss the latest thinking in subclade structure when there is no recent
> data that we can access. I better see if Butler and NIST have more current
> data that the public can access - where is all the current stuff?
>
> David F.
>
>
>
> -------------- Original message --------------
>
> > Did anyone out there download or look at Hammer's Table of SNP derived
> states
> > for the YCC haplotypes? Dennis Garvey called our attention to this
Hammer
> paper
> > yesterday. I would like to discuss what I am reading in that table with
> anyone
> > who has or can look at it.
> >
> > Ken
>
>
> ==============================
> Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the
> last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more:
> http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx
>
>
>
>
>
> ==============================
> Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the
> last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more:
> http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx
>


==============================
Jumpstart your genealogy with OneWorldTree. Search not only for
ancestors, but entire generations. Learn more:
http://www.ancestry.com/s13972/rd.ashx




This thread: