GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-07 > 1120347933
From: "Glen Todd" <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] Traditional vs Genetic Genealogy - Skipping a Generation
Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2005 17:45:33 -0600
In-Reply-To: <42C71E5D.2030307@scs.uiuc.edu>
> Y-DNA only trumps non-suspect paper when there is a difference of
> haplogroup, or when the 99.5% TMRCA range does not overlap what the
> paper says. If your paper TMRCA falls at the 90 or 95%
> probability limit of the DNA, you've got a case where DNA refuses
> to decide.
Very true. Given that kind of a case, such as when a genetic father is a
brother or cousin of the father of record, you could indeed have a situation
where DNA won't make the call. (OTOH, the impact of such on the
'traditional' family tree would be minimal.) I was thinking in terms of
the more straightforward case where the two (DNA and paper trail) simply do
not agree with each other. In that case it's my opinion that the DNA
wins.
Glen
This thread:
| RE: [DNA] Traditional vs Genetic Genealogy - Skipping a Generation by "Glen Todd" <> |