GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-09 > 1126036326


From: <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Haplogroup K
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 20:52:06 +0100
References: <200509061745.j86Hj6Zl029648@mail.rootsweb.com> <006d01c5b311$2406d290$e9db2f50@Masterbedroom> <005601c5b317$7e6e6170$71509045@Ken1>


Ken

the "minimal" haplotype is very easily mistaken for R1b - 14,12,24,10,13,13
for DYS19/388/390/1/2/3 is modal in the Cinnioglu paper. The ysearch
clusters appear to be more inclined towards 22/23 for DYS390.
There appear to be distinctive values at the following markers
DYS385a 13/14 DYS385b 15/16 (has anyone been tested with DYS385K?)
DYS459 - universally 9,9
DYS454 - 12 or 13
DYS449 - ranging from 32 to 35
DYS464 - 10/11-11-15-16 or 11-13/14-16-16
DYS438 - 9
YCAii - 23,24

Possibly there are others in the 3rd FTDNA panel and the extra markers from
other companies but there is insufficient data.

Gareth


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, September 06, 2005 8:16 PM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Haplogroup K


> I found two haplotypes with the earlier stated 7 markers of the K
haplotype
> in Sorenson. Can one give a more generic 7 marker haplotype version for
K?
>
> Ken


This thread: