GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-09 > 1127093626


From: "David Wilson" <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] Results from DNA-fingerprint
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2005 18:34:03 -0700
In-Reply-To: <432E0E80.60600@dna-fingerprint.com>


I posted my recent DNAF results a few days ago, but I will repeat them on
this thread so they can all be found together in an archives search:

Haplogroup R1b1c (confirmed by M269+)

DYS726: 12
DYS413: 21 - 23
DYF385S1: 10 - 11
DYF399S1: 22 - 25 - 27.1

Ken, I don't think there is anything further for Gareth and Thomas to work
out about nomenclature. After reading the latest nomenclature standards and
discussing it at length with Thomas, Gareth decided that the proper
nomenclature for 399S1 involved adding six to the values he quoted in his
JOGG article.

The only thing that yet puzzles me about this multi-copy marker is whether
the long form or the short form of the results should be given greater heed.
Perhaps Gareth or Thomas could offer a thought on that.

David Wilson




-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Krahn [mailto:]
Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2005 6:04 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [DNA] Results from DNA-fingerprint

wrote:

>Anyone with results please post them to the list if possible.
>
>Gareth
>
>
>
Gareth:
Just for completition, my results can be seen here:
http://www.dna-fingerprint.com/user.php?op=userinfo&uname=thomas

Thomas

--
DNA-Fingerprint Tel.: +49-3329/697464
Fasanenstrasse 25a http://www.dna-fingerprint.com
14532 Stahnsdorf / Germany mailto:


==============================
Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the last
12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more:
http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx

--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.1/104 - Release Date: 9/16/2005


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.1/104 - Release Date: 9/16/2005


This thread: