GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-09 > 1127257567


From: Thomas Krahn <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Results from DNA-fingerprint
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 01:06:07 +0200
References: <380-220059220214337977@M2W087.mail2web.com> <43308839.6020402@dna-fingerprint.com> <REME20050920182157@alum.mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <REME20050920182157@alum.mit.edu>


John Chandler wrote:

>>Two possibilities:
>>1.) R1b is related to E3b
>>2.) We have some strange recombination (??????)
>>
>>
>
>Third view:
>
>There are roughly 100 completely different ways to make "15.3" out
>of "16" by deleting one base pair from the segment between the two
>primers. I don't see any need to suppose that one 15.3 is a match
>to any other 15.3, unless you actually sequence the PCR product.
>Have you verified that they are indeed identical?
>
John,
I will check this by sequencing it, but why would this be exactly the
g-type and none of the 3 g-types?
Walther Parson has reported, that they have only observed one structure
for the DYS464 allele 15.3 in the format:
(CCTT)7CTT(CCTT)8

Thomas

--
DNA-Fingerprint Tel.: +49-3329/697464
Fasanenstrasse 25a http://www.dna-fingerprint.com
14532 Stahnsdorf / Germany mailto:

This thread: