GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-10 > 1129246151
From: "Lowe DNA" <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] Haplogroup Q?
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:29:11 -0500
Go to Ethnoancestry and order a SNP test.
From: Dale E. Reddick [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 6:25 PM
Subject: Re: [DNA] Haplogroup Q?
FTDNA first predicted that I was Q - based upon my initial 12 marker test.
However, Whit's predictor strongly places me in R1b and much less
strongly in Q.
Then TOO... FTDNA now has -predicted- that several of my tested cousins
AND... My Q SNP test through FTDNA was due back on April 15 - it's now
SIX months overdue.
So, I placed a double-barreled set of SNP tests with EA.
I suspect that there's something screwball about Q predictions.
Or, some of us with western European ancestries have Hunnish paternal
ancestry - perhaps...
Ken Nordtvedt wrote:
> Someone has to explain why Q looks so promising? This looks very much
> like an R1b to me. DYS19 is low but mutations happen! DYS439 has
> aparently mutated up. It is maybe even a Frisian R1b?
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "David" <>
> To: <>
> Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 4:31 PM
> Subject: [DNA] Haplogroup Q?
>> The Clan MacMillan study had some new results posted (12 markers so
>> I used Whit Athey's haplogroup predictor and get Q - 50 and R1b - 45.
>> Is there
>> someone who'd take a look and let me know if they actually look Q or
>> just a strange R1b. These would be the first McMillan results other
>> than R1b or I.
>> 393 - 13
>> 390 - 23
>> 19 - 13
>> 391 - 11
>> 385a - 11
>> 385b - 14
>> 426 - 12
>> 388 - 12
>> 439 - 13
>> 389-1 - 13
>> 392 - 13
>> 389-2 - 30
>> I haven't added the results to my website, yet. Don't know where I
>> should put
Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the
areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months.
Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx
|RE: [DNA] Haplogroup Q? by "Lowe DNA" <>|