GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-10 > 1130497112
From: "John McEwan" <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] Haplogroup I website
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 23:58:32 +1300
If you look at the modal values for Ix that I have listed in
they also follow what Ken has defined below.
From: Ken Nordtvedt [mailto:]
Sent: Friday, 28 October 2005 4:59 p.m.
Subject: Re: [DNA] Haplogroup I website
Glen, I choose to use 438 = 10 as one of the defining markers to search
Ix. There were 63 of them in Sorenson. With 438 = 8 there is 1, a
With 438 = 11 there is 1 from Denmark. With 438 = 9 there are none.
438 allowed me to range over 459a,b, and I find somewhere between 60 and
percent of the haplotypes have 8,10. So 10 to 40 percent have something
else. I have the other counts somewhere, but must look around for them.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Glen Todd" <>
Sent: Thursday, October 27, 2005 8:59 PM
Subject: [DNA] Haplogroup I website
> I've got a couple of questions from your new website - specifically
> definition. First, you list 438=10 as defining, but Boucher (BAYSF)
> an 8 there. Second, you list 459a,b=8,10 as >60% modal, but I've
> as defining. It certainly is in my table, and it was one of the
> that Bonnie gave me originally as the indicators for Ix. (The
> being 10,12 at 455,454 and 19,19 at YCAII.)
> Could you clarify, please?
> Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the
> last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more:
New! Family Tree Maker 2005. Build your tree and search for your
ancestors at the same time. Share your tree with family and friends.