GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-11 > 1131136300


From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] H Haplo?
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 13:31:40 -0700
References: <110420051705.10355.436B94E10009AF1A0000287322070016419C9B01019D0A050C01B4@comcast.net> <002a01c5e163$07630930$71509045@Ken1> <436B9C74.8040404@scs.uiuc.edu> <000801c5e167$6ebbf520$71509045@Ken1> <06f801c5e17c$08e5cf40$bd699804@work>


No, purely an accident of two different naming systems using some of the
same letters. It's much better to be a mtdna U or V. There are no U or V
ydna haplogroups.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Diane" <>
To: <>
Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 1:12 PM
Subject: Re: [DNA] H Haplo?


>
>
> Is a H the same group when found in males or females DNA?. Does it mean
> the same.
>
>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Doug McDonald" <>
>> To: <>
>> Sent: Friday, November 04, 2005 10:37 AM
>> Subject: Re: [DNA] H Haplo?
>>
>>
>>> Ken Nordtvedt wrote:
>>>> H is extremely unusual in Europe, and maybe in the world.
>>>
>>>
>>> H is very common in India, both in tribal and caste groups.
>>>
>>> In Europe perhaps this means "gypsy". Just perhaps. Or of
>>> course, in England, it would also suggest "returned colonial
>>> family formerly stationed in India."
>>>
>>> Doug McDonald
>
>
>
> ==============================
> Jumpstart your genealogy with OneWorldTree. Search not only for
> ancestors, but entire generations. Learn more:
> http://www.ancestry.com/s13972/rd.ashx
>
>


This thread: