GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-11 > 1131580036


From: "D. Wilson" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] S21
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 15:49:18 -0800
References: <001101c5e552$9149a990$f3de0818@mycomputer> <000601c5e55b$6711eda0$3201a8c0@southcoastplaza.com> <BAY104-DAV177B0C2A5C942C93F89543F1670@phx.gbl>


That's an illustrative counterexample, and it reinforces Ken's earlier
comment about making sure to look at 447 and H4 as part of the value set
pointing to Frisian. 464 by itself may indicate a possibility, but it
deserves some support from other markers if one is going to use it for
diagnostic purposes on S21. (And on other clades too, to generalize from a
specific instance.)

David W.



----- Original Message -----
From: "William Hurst" <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 3:30 PM
Subject: Re: [DNA] S21


> David Wilson wrote:
>
>>For an at-a-glance comparison, look at the DYS464 values. If you see
> 15-16-17-18, think Frisian R1b and S21+. If you see 15-15-17-17, think
>>mainstream R1b and S21-.
>
> Oops, if I look in the mirror I see 15-16-17-18 - and S21-.
>
> Bill Hurst
>
>
> ==============================
> Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the
> last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more:
> http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx
>

This thread: