GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-11 > 1131662882
From: "Lowe DNA" <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] 2nd FTDNA conference
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2005 16:48:02 -0600
In-Reply-To: <20051110213707.32645.qmail@web50714.mail.yahoo.com>
David..
Bet SNP testing was not high on the list either ???
Bill
-----Original Message-----
From: David Faux [mailto:]
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 3:37 PM
To:
Subject: Re: [DNA] 2nd FTDNA conference
Primer sequences, from the U of A, good luck. I asked whether the sequences
for an autosomal marker being discussed could be sent and was told that if I
had kept up to date with the academic literature then it would not be
necessary. I retorted with a question as to whether it would be any easier
to find than some of the newer P sequence Y-SNPs and was promptly shot down.
Amazing how when you are in the audience you can be summarily dismissed with
a "next question please".
David Faux.
wrote:
Thomas
I sent Max Blankfeld an e-mail on Tuesday as nothing appears to have been
said at the conference. No reply yet!
Gareth
----- Original Message -----
From: "Thomas Krahn"
To:
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2005 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: [DNA] 2nd FTDNA conference
> Has anybody tried to ask FTDNA about CDY, DYS724 and about the primers
> thereof?
>
> Thomas
>
> --
> DNA-Fingerprint Tel.: +49-3329/697464
> Fasanenstrasse 25a http://www.dna-fingerprint.com
> 14532 Stahnsdorf / Germany mailto:
==============================
Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the
last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more:
http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx
This thread:
| RE: [DNA] 2nd FTDNA conference by "Lowe DNA" <> |