GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-11 > 1133093674
From: Yair Davidiy <>
Subject: J1 or J2 were originally ALL CMH?
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 15:19:59 +0200
References: <4387486E.2060001@charter.net><00d701c5f1f7$7461cdb0$408eb840@JamesRCarr>
In-Reply-To: <00d701c5f1f7$7461cdb0$408eb840@JamesRCarr>
It is now said (e. g. A MOSAIC OF PEOPLE; THE JEWISH STORY AND A
REASSESSMENT OF THE DNA EVIDENCE by Ellen
Levy-Coffman
"<http://www.jogg.info/coffman.htm>http://www.jogg.info/coffman.htm"; ) and
elsewhere that the CMH is found in both J1 and J2.
Does this not suggest that the CMH PRECEDED the division between J1 and J2?
If this is so would it not then hold that either ALL or ALL J2 were
originally CMH?
This thread:
| J1 or J2 were originally ALL CMH? by Yair Davidiy <> |