GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-11 > 1133098157
From: Yair Davidiy <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] J1 or J2 were originally ALL CMH?
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 16:34:25 +0200
In-Reply-To: <firstname.lastname@example.org m>
At 02:40 PM 11/27/2005, you wrote:
>The CMH can arise on a J1 and a J2 background independently.
In other words it is not a one-time event?
>addition to the CMH, there are numerous other haplotypes shared by
>both J1 and J2, and there is no reason to believe that the CMH in
>particular was the ancestral haplotype of haplogroup J. Actually, it
>was almost certainly not, because the CMH has a long DYS388-16, and
>ancestral J almost certainly had a short DYS388.
It therefore appears in both J1 and J2 after they have separated from each
|Re: [DNA] J1 or J2 were originally ALL CMH? by Yair Davidiy <>|