GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-11 > 1133098157


From: Yair Davidiy <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] J1 or J2 were originally ALL CMH?
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 16:34:25 +0200
References: <4387486E.2060001@charter.net><00d701c5f1f7$7461cdb0$408eb840@JamesRCarr><6.1.2.0.2.20051127151913.01ce4cc0@mail.netvision.net.il><f3f05ce80511270440w59316cb9y93ec0553bc885d66@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <f3f05ce80511270440w59316cb9y93ec0553bc885d66@mail.gmail.co m>


At 02:40 PM 11/27/2005, you wrote:
>The CMH can arise on a J1 and a J2 background independently.

In other words it is not a one-time event?

>In
>addition to the CMH, there are numerous other haplotypes shared by
>both J1 and J2, and there is no reason to believe that the CMH in
>particular was the ancestral haplotype of haplogroup J. Actually, it
>was almost certainly not, because the CMH has a long DYS388-16, and
>ancestral J almost certainly had a short DYS388.

It therefore appears in both J1 and J2 after they have separated from each
other?



This thread: