GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-11 > 1133126656


From: ellen Levy <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] J1 or J2 were originally ALL CMH?
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 13:24:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <6.1.2.0.2.20051127163219.01ce3e40@mail.netvision.net.il>


However, I do agree with your assessment, Dienekes,
that the CMH can appear independently on both a J1 and
J2 background (ie, cross-over haplotypes).

Unfortunately, I have no information concerning the
putative ancestral haplotype for J*.

Ellen Coffman

--- Yair Davidiy <> wrote:

> At 02:40 PM 11/27/2005, you wrote:
> >The CMH can arise on a J1 and a J2 background
> independently.
>
> In other words it is not a one-time event?
>
> >In
> >addition to the CMH, there are numerous other
> haplotypes shared by
> >both J1 and J2, and there is no reason to believe
> that the CMH in
> >particular was the ancestral haplotype of
> haplogroup J. Actually, it
> >was almost certainly not, because the CMH has a
> long DYS388-16, and
> >ancestral J almost certainly had a short DYS388.
>
> It therefore appears in both J1 and J2 after they
> have separated from each
> other?
>
>
>
>
> ==============================
> Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million
> records added in the
> last 12 months. Largest online collection in the
> world. Learn more:
> http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx
>
>

This thread: