GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2005-12 > 1134233037


From: "Dean McGee" <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] At last --Some Results from the Irish Study
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 11:43:59 -0500
In-Reply-To: <001101c5fda6$49a02e40$6500a8c0@G2k>


I incorrectly included FTDNA as testing for DYS461. This marker is not part
of their 37 marker test. However, the modal McGee results with DNAH are 12
for DYS461 and 11 with SMGF. The McGee modal matches the IMH on the
remaining common markers.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dean McGee [mailto:]
> Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 11:25 AM
> To:
> Subject: RE: [DNA] At last --Some Results from the Irish Study
>
>
> The TCD team gives the IMH as
>
> DYS19 14
> DYS388 12
> DYS390 25
> DYS391 11
> DYS392 14
> DYS393 13
> DYS434 9
> DYS435 11
> DYS436 12
> DYS437 15
> DYS438 12
> DYS439 12
> DYS389I 13
> DYS389B 16
> DYS460 11
> DYS461 10
> DYS462 11
>
> I notice that DYS461 has a value of 10. I suspect that we
> must add 2 to this to meet FTDNA and DNAH conventions and add
> 1 for SMGF. SMGF, http://smgf.org/marker_details.html#DYS461
> , shows a significant modal value of 11 for this marker.
> This corresponds to 12 for FTDNA. Nearly all the McGee
> results have 12 for DYS461.
>
> -Dean McGee


This thread: