GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2006-01 > 1136330607
From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] Re: Haplogroup I1*x
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:23:27 -0700
References: <1d7.4c30820b.30ec4c6c@aol.com>
After seeing your 25 marker upgrade at Ysearch, I'd say you are definately
of the I1*x cluster. It has already been proven NOT I1a, I1b, or I1c.
If Dr. Jim Wilson announces that new SNPs S23 and S24 are sufficiently
upstream to encompass both I1c and I1b, then I would recommend testing for
these SNPs --- S23 and S24. If S23 and S24 are found to only be associated
with I1c (which seems to be the more likely situation), then at the moment I
can not think of an SNP which is worth testing for with an I1*x haplotype.
I have heard no new reports on the S23/S24 placement issue or reports of
tests which might give a hint for awhile.
Ken
----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 2:53 PM
Subject: [DNA] Re: Haplogroup I1*x
> Glen and Ken,
> I sent this message earlier this afternoon but it apparently didn't go
> through so I'll try again:
>
> My grandfather has had 25 markers tested, but I forgot to update his
> record
> at Ysearch (X22KV), which I've now done. I'm handling so many testees that
> I
> got confused about his SNP status: He's been SNP tested as P19+ and
> P37.2- by
> FTDNA. Does this make him hg I1*x? Are there any more SNP tests he
> could/should have to clarify this?
> Thanks for your help.
> Lisa
>
>
> ==============================
> Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the
> areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months.
> Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx
>
>
This thread:
| Re: [DNA] Re: Haplogroup I1*x by "Ken Nordtvedt" <> |