GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2006-02 > 1140054815


From: "Phil Goff" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] I1a Results
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:53:35 -0600
References: <43F3C54E.4020509@mchsi.com> <001b01c6328f$848aaa30$bec79045@Ken1> <43F3CA69.3030001@mchsi.com> <000601c63292$fbe57210$bec79045@Ken1> <43F3D295.4040003@mchsi.com> <002f01c63297$8b7c7dc0$bec79045@Ken1> <43F3D627.50904@mchsi.com> <015201c63299$cb740040$6948b843@YOURF8387228BF> <002801c6329a$c8288950$bec79045@Ken1>


I have written to Bennett Greenspan and asked him to clear up the confusion
about P30+/P40-, since it appears from what I read on the FTDNA site that
P40 was not tested. When I receive a response, I'll pass along the
information. Thanks,

Phil
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
To: <>
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 7:46 PM
Subject: Re: [DNA] I1a Results


> Then how do we read M21 and M72 which should be tested once P30+ is
> established?

This thread: