GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2006-02 > 1140993888
From:
Subject: Re: [DNA] What exactly do my results mean
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 17:44:48 EST
In a message dated 2/26/2006 12:57:39 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
writes:
X-Message: #16
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:36:23 -0700
From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
To:
Message-ID: <001601c63afb$29cbc420$>
Subject: Re: [DNA] What exactly do my results mean
Content-Type: text/plain;
format=flowed;
charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<I don't know the "beginning" of the posts for this either. In my catalog
of
<varieties of R1b I have the small Irish one with 8,9 at 459 and the
<13,13,15,17 at 464. I believe the 8,9 at 459 resulted from a single-step
<mutation from the rather robust 9,9 population of R1bs which is present
most
<everywhere (9,10 is the dominant modal). But this variety with unique 459
<and 464 has a definite Irish connection, with such surnames as Lynch,
Casey,
<Cusic, Hogan, Bryan, Bryant, O-Dea, Burke, and now your Dorsey from Ireland.
<Ken
Ken and All:
I may have kicked off some of the discussions of this unique haplotype, both
on and off the list. You might want to check my personal web page at -:
_http://hometown.aol.com/dolmenx/myhomepage/index.html_
(http://hometown.aol.com/dolmenx/myhomepage/index.html)
I'm working on a second page of discussion of this comparatively rare
result. I have found a cluster in a very confined area of west Clare which I
attribute to adoptions/ fosterings of orphaned children of my own KEANE family.
These are BUTLER, O'BRIEN and CASEY with GDs of 4-5 with me. I've found a
number of others above GD 6 spread out from NW Ireland (Donegal) down thru the
Midlands and into the Tipperary/ Limerick/Clare region. This may suggest a
possibly widespread pre-surname tribal group, perhaps now reduced in numbers.
I note the names CUSIC (variant of CUSACK) and BURKE in your list. These
are Norman surnames. Any idea where these specific ones came from in Ireland?
As I have the only known O'CAHAN connected pedigree going back to Ulster at
least to the beginning of surnames (with reservations about the Niall of 9H
part), I have been able to compare it with historical events involving each
of these families leading to a very plausible explanation of adoption rather
than blood descent from any one of them. BUTLER is Anglo-Norman, in Ireland
"only" since after 1170; O'BRIEN is usually of the Dalcassian line (from
Brian 'Boru' - k. 1216), but I don't believe my match falls into that category,
though they are married into my KEANE/O'CAHAN line; CASEY is also married
into KEANE/ O'CAHAN as recently as 1714 in Clare, exactly at a time when
arrangements for fostering must have been made with relatives.
Len Keane
(The O'CAHAN)
This thread:
| Re: [DNA] What exactly do my results mean by |