GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2006-03 > 1142206582


From: "Ken Nordtvedt" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] R1a Norse modal: H4 by which standard?
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:36:22 -0700
References: <BKEPIIDHHKEPCMDIEBKBIEEPCPAA.andrew.en.inge@skynet.be>


You need YCAIIa,b values!


----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrew and Inge" <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 4:24 PM
Subject: [DNA] R1a Norse modal: H4 by which standard?


> Doug, Ken, R1a watchers,
>
> In that case I seem to be correct to put 11 in for our new Leviston R1a
> data
> who was an Ocford Ancestors customer, now getting more markers done at DNA
> FP. In the MacLea/Livingston project, the R1a group are all "Norse", so
> far
> with the same variations, and all have the surname Livingston, or a
> variant,
> and those with paper trails back out of the new world have Irish ancestry.
> So though we only have shortish haplotypes the null hypothesis is that
> this
> is one family. I'd appreciate any comments on how they seem to fit in the
> greater schemes of things.
>
> See the R1a table which is the third on our results page:
> http://users.skynet.be/lancaster/Discussion%20Maclea.htm
>
> Best Regards
> Andrew
>
> ===
> From: Doug McDonald <>
> Subject: Re: [DNA] R1a Norse modal: H4 by which standard?
> Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 10:28:38 -0600
> References: <>
> <000c01c645ef$c86636c0$>
> In-Reply-To: <000c01c645ef$c86636c0$>
>
>
> Ken Nordtvedt wrote:
>> I show Norwegian R1a has modal 13 at H4 using the SMGF, DNAH, RelGen
>> conventions which are the same for this marker. I believe that would be
>> a 12 in FTDNA convention.
>>
>
> I agree.
>
> Doug McDonald
>
>
> ==============================
> View and search Historical Newspapers. Read about your ancestors, find
> marriage announcements and more. Learn more:
> http://www.ancestry.com/s13969/rd.ashx
>
>



This thread: