GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives
Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2006-04 > 1143876453
From:
Subject: Re: [DNA] an unexpected haplogroup result
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 07:27:33 +0000
Then the Neolithic was devoid of pioneers who moved on simply because the next hill was there? How do we know this? What are the archaeological signs?
Rebekah
-------------- Original message from Gary Felix <>: --------------
> The Neolithic had domesticated wheat, barley, lentil, chickpea, large seeded
> grasses, Sheep, Goats, Cows, Pigs and Horses. These resources were unknown in
> the rest of the world. This was the breadbasket of the world 8K ybp.
> The Neolithic would have only moved when things got too crowded and only to
> places where they could maintain their lifestyle. It would take long term
> domestication to get their crops to grow in different climes.
>
> Eventually those that brought these resources to the rest of the world would
> be the conquerors.
>
> Gary
> Mexico DNA Project Admin.
This thread:
| Re: [DNA] an unexpected haplogroup result by |