GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2006-04 > 1143880820


From: Gary Felix <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] an unexpected haplogroup result
Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 00:40:20 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <040120060821.6892.442E37F0000348E900001AEC219791280203010CD2079C080C03BF0E0B0E020E0C080E050A0D0A9D@mchsi.com>


The Neolithic were J, E3b and G. When you re read Jobling ref. p.309-324.

Gary
Mexico DNA Project Admin.

wrote:
Farmers tend to stay put? If only someone had thought to tell my ancestors that... :-) I shall have to go reread Jobling to start nit picking.:-D Were the hunter gatherer groups from significantly different gene pools than the Neo-farmers? Did they switch back and forth in focus as they moved? Hum. How many of those sites do we have DNA from? It would be mostly mtDNA I would think... How many are artifacts only?

Rebekah


==============================
Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the
last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx




This thread: