GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2006-04 > 1143906812


From: "Alfred A. Aburto Jr." <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] {Bonnie} an unexpected haplogroup result
Date: Sat, 01 Apr 2006 07:55:05 -0800
References: <002901c655a2$99558760$0101a8c0@HighReaches.local>
In-Reply-To: <002901c655a2$99558760$0101a8c0@HighReaches.local>


> Glen Todd wrote:

>>This is a bit off topic I suppose, but I noticed an
>>interesting result in looking at Greenspan's 12 marker
>>CMH (CMH-12) haplotypes versus genetic distance (GD):
>>
>>CMH-12 at GD 0: I cases = 0
>>CMH-12 at GD 1: I cases = 0
>>CMH-12 at GD 2: I cases = 0
>>CMH-12 at GD 3: I cases = 1
>>CMH-12 at GD 4: I cases = 2
>>CMH-12 at GD 5: I cases = 44
>>CMH-12 at GD 6: I cases = 160
>>
>>As one moves away from the CMH-12, the number of I haplotype cases
>>increases rapidly.
>>Al
>>
>>
>
>Al;
>
>Why would you expect to see anything different? My understanding of CMH,
>either in the -6 or -12 version, is that it is exclusively a J phenomenon.
>If the theory of the meaning of CMH has any validity, it would have come
>into existence many thousands of years after the I/J split.
>
>Glen
>
>

It was just interesting Glen, the connection between I and J. There were
no other groups that fell in there except a few R1b's and one F case.
There were 977 total cases ...
Al


This thread: