GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2006-04 > 1144075944


From: Bonnie Schrack <>
Subject: RE: [DNA] Missing Links
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2006 10:52:24 -0400


Ken,

>Actually we don't even know what an IJx(I,J)
>extended haplotype looks like, or whether they still exist, or if exist
>in what percentage and where?
>
Very true, but thinking out loud here, wouldn't they come disguised as
"F*" haplotypes? They have usually put samples there, that have been
negative for G, H, I, J, and K SNPs but positive for M89; I would think
some of these would have to be tested for S22 or S2 to see whether any
of them were IJ. There are few of them, but there have been F samples
found in some studies, haven't there? I realize sometimes those are
just undertested samples, called F out of laziness, but not always, I think.

Actually I ran into a "Nordtvedt" haplotype in Ysearch that was labeled
F; I suppose you have mentioned this on the list, but I wasn't listening?

Bonnie

This thread: