GENEALOGY-DNA-L Archives

Archiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2006-04 > 1145206416


From: "john" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] McCall MtDNA
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 09:53:36 -0700
References: <27b.7de9325.3173c86b@aol.com>


Those are My Mtdna mutations also. Have you had
ftdna do a deep clade? Mine is H7 and the last time
I checked I had 47 exact matches at HVR1 and HVR2.
However after the Mt-H results there were only 2 and one
of them was My Uncle who I had tested to prove the results.
So if you have not done so you should as matches are out
there.

John


----- Original Message -----
From: <>
To: <>
Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 9:18 AM
Subject: Re: [DNA] McCall MtDNA


> In a message dated 04/13/06 5:03:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
>
> writes:
>
>> Thank you for your help on our MtDNA. In reply, I don't believe that any
>> of
>>
>> our ladies that tested have any connections earlier than 1700's and these
>> are
>> not proven. The McCall family is not large and from what I've read I
>> wouldn't
>> expect much change in last 3000 years?
>
>
> Then I'm more surprised that you don't see some more variation in your
> collection. The haplotype you listed, 16519C 263G 315.1C (and no
> additional
> mutations) is common, found in perhaps 5-10% of Europeans. But for six out
> of six to
> have that exact haplotype would be unusual. You McCall ladies would trace
> their
> maternal lines through many different surnames and locations.
>
>> I was interested to note that MacCaulay ladies are Haplogroup T? This
>> should show that McCalls are not from MacCaulay family?
>
> The surnames are traced via the Y chromosome, not mtDNA, so you'd need a
> different type of test to check out that hypothesis. Are you part of a
> surname
> project?
>
> Ann Turner
>
>
> ==============================
> Search the US Census Collection. Over 140 million records added in the
> last 12 months. Largest online collection in the world. Learn more:
> http://www.ancestry.com/s13965/rd.ashx
>
>


This thread: