GENEALOGY-DNA-L ArchivesArchiver > GENEALOGY-DNA > 2006-04 > 1146249915
From: "Eric Olson" <>
Subject: Re: [DNA] extension to 59 markers
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 11:45:15 -0700
Not necessary. You have completely answered my question. I wanted to be
assured their is nothing intrinsically known to be different or special in
the markers of the last panel, such as higher mutation rates.
Also don't want to get into a discussion of the Monte Hall problem, in all
it guises, here.
> [Original Message]
> From: <>
> To: <>
> Date: 4/28/2006 9:26:57 AM
> Subject: Re: [DNA] extension to 59 markers
> In a message dated 04/28/06 6:42:08 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> > Why the last panel? Because that is the only panel left unseen? Last
> > chance to see an expected mutation? Or is there somthing different about
> > the last panel, from the first?
> Because it's the last panel left unseen. I'll respond more in another
> Ann Turner
|Re: [DNA] extension to 59 markers by "Eric Olson" <>|